1
Direct the portfolio
Leadership decides which AI agents deserve investment and who owns the business results.
- Business priorities
- Named owners
- Value measures
- Executive review
HAIMO · Education in managing AI agents
A shared method for managing AI agents,
with education for those responsible.
The management gap
Management must evolve to support the people responsible for the results.
Companies are deploying AI agents into everyday work. That creates new responsibilities for the people who lead it.
HAIMO gives teams a common way to
manage that work.
A new approach to management
People remain responsible for decisions and outcomes.
Every agent works within an agreed remit.
Leaders can see work that needs their attention.
Owners are named and intervention is possible.
of AI implementation challenges identified by BCG relate to people and processes, not technology alone.
of surveyed board directors and executives say their boards have limited or no AI knowledge or experience.
report agentic-AI governance capabilities, although 71% expect agent deployment within 12 months.
of respondents report a positive organizational EBIT contribution from AI.
Sources: BCG press release, October 24, 2024. Deloitte Global Boardroom Program, Governance of AI, 2nd edition (2025). Gartner press release, October 19, 2026. McKinsey, The state of AI in 2026: On the road to ROI (August 2026).
An AI agent can perform work.
A person must remain answerable for what happens.
Routine stays with the person and the team. Each level of leadership sees what it needs, from one person's agents to the full portfolio, and continues to lead people.
A PMO gives teams a common way to plan and oversee projects. HAIMO applies that management principle to work involving AI agents, without requiring every business to create a new department.
One method, used by every team
Technical teams build and maintain AI systems. HAIMO concentrates on how the business manages their work and supports the people responsible.
1
Leadership decides which AI agents deserve investment and who owns the business results.
2
Managers set the remit for an agent and decide how its work is checked.
3
Leaders help employees adapt to work in which agents take on part of the task.
At every levelCompanyTeamsIndividualsExternal partnersCustomers
Try the management decisions behind an agent. Choose a role, then see where human review belongs before the work can proceed.
Select an agent to view its record.Every agent needs a named owner.
Every program comes with a shared library: handbooks, playbooks, one-pagers, infographics and short films.
People remain responsible for the work an agent performs on their behalf.
Education and practical guidance for the people now managing work alongside AI agents. Choose the level that matches your responsibilities.
Agent ManagementIndividuals and managers
The Human-AI Management OfficeLeadership teams
The purpose of a management office has always been to help people do their work better.
Tarja Stephens learned this firsthand through more than a decade leading complex international operations. As a senior executive and Lean Six Sigma Black Belt, she built project management offices and led operational excellence initiatives across international teams.
The value of these offices was never simply about reporting or procedures. It was about giving people a shared understanding of the work.
When everyone works from the same management system, decisions become clearer. Problems can be addressed before they affect the entire operation. Leaders gain the visibility to support their teams, while people spend less time navigating organizational complexity.
That experience became the foundation for a new question.
What happens when the workforce is no longer made up of humans alone?
AI agents are entering business operations, taking on responsibilities that previously belonged to employees. Yet the management structures overseeing that work were designed for human teams.
AI investment produces value when the resulting work improves the business. HAIMO helps organizations examine the management conditions behind that improvement.
Look beyond a single automated task to the delays and rework around it.
Compare an AI agent’s actual contribution with the cost and effort of operating it.
Prepare people for changed responsibilities rather than assuming a course alone will change the work.
Use clear review points before extending agent activity to more of the business.
We welcome discussion with organizations testing how agent-enabled work should be managed. Share what your teams are learning or explore collaboration.
Tell us what your team is trying to manage. We will help you identify the most relevant HAIMO material or program.
Or contact info@leadersofthefuture.com.
HAIMO is a management method for work involving AI agents, supported by education and practical resources. It is based on the same principle as a project management office: teams need a shared way to oversee complex work.
No. HAIMO is a method and education offer, not an AI platform. It is designed to work alongside an organization’s existing systems.
No. The organization and its technical partners remain responsible for the agents they develop or deploy. HAIMO focuses on how their work is managed.
HAIMO is a supporting layer for your AI transformation. It brings management, leadership and education to your AI initiatives, whatever tools and technology you use, and gives everyone a common language.
No. The approach is technology-neutral. Its application depends on the organization’s systems and controls.
Your organization decides how to apply the method. The aim is to equip your existing leaders and teams, rather than require a permanent external office.
Start with the management question your organization needs to address. The program descriptions explain the available formats; our team can help you choose.